Time and spirited negotiations happen on internet fora pertaining to a study of the status of a variety of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based cortical period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (that the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As happens, some of the discussants began to branch to other side discussions which really had nothing related to all the original questions or issues and some became a bit resolved and emotional, as additionally usually happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks have been required so as to get into the underside of matters and where some times an interest has been discussed on several unique boards and several topics simultaneously on a particular board! As too is average, nothing was really resolved, and a few of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about those topics coming up again and again again and again directing people to archives . Unfortunately, the ya-hoo forums/fora are those that only limited hunting of past messages is possible without losing all of one's hair, and the archives sometimes are kept onto yet another yahoo site which means this will not help matters when everybody wants is to get yourself a quick overview of what the others are already using and when possible their reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings about more gall than good information though the aim of the individual posing the question may have been quite noble and not at all confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic traits!
Somewhere, across the path of the former quest, yet another issue got born and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes which are the center of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers at the kind of harmonic charts. This is something that is utilized in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of even the earliest members at the forum who finally confessed to this kind of case. I myself, though myself not that mature, have experienced horoscopes that were attracted in the century before last where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and thus on and more importantly had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan matka panel chart So, at the very least some individuals were utilizing varga-charts a handful of hundred years ago and conceivably perhaps even ahead of these times.
Somewhere through the discussion, in another of the lists, one of those associates made available a post in that the author had expressed notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be used in a chart format. A discussion ensued which side stepped the more important and pertinent matter of these practical merits of using of navamsha varga as a second chart. A few individuals requested for accusations in classics that indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants emphasized that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used and varga placements should only be useful for determining the strengths of planets etc..
One of the members brought to all astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very clearly just how to determine bhavas from the rashi graph (ascendant, 10th house and trisection of their arcs, etc. in Chapter V of BPHS). This was indeed true and also a positive step forward in the conversation. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS wasn't original and was not even a classic and written by one or even a group of'latterday saints' [my term, not the original poster's!] In Jyotish and for that reason cannot be treated as a timeless. Obviously, there was some support to this as could possibly be similarly expected if some one were to produce a comment that Jyotish was just a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. A topic that's been proven to bring even untoward jyotishis out on the"warpath!"
To those who have been interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Additional varga kundalis would be the item of corrupt comprehension of the classics which themselves many concur might not have survived in pure form [although some of them have thankfully lived in reasonably good shape1]. Underlying that is the belief some may harbor that, alike the iceberg, available Jyotish is just 1/10th of their total human anatomy while the submerged 9/10th is largely lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas and a number of the secret documents that you can get but jealously safeguarded by the custodian families. I do not know just how a lot of the iceberg postulate is based data and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists of this particular stream of thought, vargas MUST only be utilised as measures of qualitative and quantitative strength of planets and also for your consideration of this deities and primal forces people represent although not in the form of a horoscope and certainly no critical consideration has to be directed at aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they'd assert, for example, that while the second dwelling lord at navamsha is an important index, the fact that it is set in the 2nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second house in navamsha chart) isn't important. Or, for instance, if Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, both planets aren't related (though they would be portrayed as being conjoined in precisely the same navamsha varga at a navamsha graph ).
(b) Irrespective of if explicitly described or perhaps not, the other stream of believing asserts that varga kundalis have a significant role to play in Jyotish and potentially are of significant usefulness in identifying chief mandates matters regarding the prescription given by sages. To put it differently, navamsha chart, by way of instance, would hold significant influence on matters of spouse and marriage, whilst saptamsha chart are of similar import in the study of children in a particular nativity's reading. All these Vargas should be analyzed in a graph format.
I do not remember anyone in the'camp (b)' saying that the very first portion of (a) is not correct, namely, the Varga rankings have to be contemplated, perse, for an study of strength and quality of an entire globe as prescribed within the Jyotish frame. There appeared to be some other people who entirely denied the veracity of thought flow (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to avoid acrimony and getting ensnared in the controversy. Or perhaps there were other motives, known only to them.